<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Sotomayor Think Latina Women Are Better Judges than White Men? Is She Right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studentactivism.net/2009/05/26/does-sotomayor-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studentactivism.net/2009/05/26/does-sotomayor-think/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurjen S.</title>
		<link>http://studentactivism.net/2009/05/26/does-sotomayor-think/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jurjen S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentactivism.net/?p=2392#comment-2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I can sort of see what Sotomayor&#039;s getting at, in that, in a society where whites and males tend to be in a more advantaged position (generally speaking) than other ethnicities and women, a white male is less likely (again, generally speaking) to be subjected to injustice than someone who is female, a member of an ethnic minority, or both. And thus, a white male may not be as practiced in spotting injustice because he&#039;s had less occasion to be at the receiving end.

I don&#039;t know that I agree with such an assessment, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s racist or sexist to think that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I can sort of see what Sotomayor&#8217;s getting at, in that, in a society where whites and males tend to be in a more advantaged position (generally speaking) than other ethnicities and women, a white male is less likely (again, generally speaking) to be subjected to injustice than someone who is female, a member of an ethnic minority, or both. And thus, a white male may not be as practiced in spotting injustice because he&#8217;s had less occasion to be at the receiving end.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I agree with such an assessment, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s racist or sexist to think that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Johnston</title>
		<link>http://studentactivism.net/2009/05/26/does-sotomayor-think/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angus Johnston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentactivism.net/?p=2392#comment-2724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly the point of mentioning Holmes and Cardozo wasn&#039;t that they were two white male justices who &quot;made decisions that we now view as unwise,&quot; but that they were two tremendously bright, tremendously capable justices who were unable to transcend their own, and their milieu&#039;s, racism and sexism.

As for what happens when you reverse the statement, no, of course I don&#039;t like it. Most statements of opposition to white male supremacy become unpalatable when recast as statements in support of white male supremacy.

And no, to answer your next question, I don&#039;t believe that Sotomayor was taking a Latina supremacist stance. You can&#039;t approach her argument in isolation -- it&#039;s an argument that exists in a context, and part of that context is the profound underrepresentation of women and people of color in American government, past and present.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly the point of mentioning Holmes and Cardozo wasn&#8217;t that they were two white male justices who &#8220;made decisions that we now view as unwise,&#8221; but that they were two tremendously bright, tremendously capable justices who were unable to transcend their own, and their milieu&#8217;s, racism and sexism.</p>
<p>As for what happens when you reverse the statement, no, of course I don&#8217;t like it. Most statements of opposition to white male supremacy become unpalatable when recast as statements in support of white male supremacy.</p>
<p>And no, to answer your next question, I don&#8217;t believe that Sotomayor was taking a Latina supremacist stance. You can&#8217;t approach her argument in isolation &#8212; it&#8217;s an argument that exists in a context, and part of that context is the profound underrepresentation of women and people of color in American government, past and present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://studentactivism.net/2009/05/26/does-sotomayor-think/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studentactivism.net/?p=2392#comment-2721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you just ignore the &quot;would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male&quot; because she pointed to two judges that made decisions that we now view as unwise. Sorry but that fails basic logic test. Pointing to two individuals as evidence of a race and sex-based lack of wisdom would be attacked if this was a white male making the reverse claim.

How do you feel about this statement coming from this white male:

&quot;I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a latina female who hasn’t lived that life.&quot;

Love it now? Want someone who said that in the highest court of the land?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you just ignore the &#8220;would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male&#8221; because she pointed to two judges that made decisions that we now view as unwise. Sorry but that fails basic logic test. Pointing to two individuals as evidence of a race and sex-based lack of wisdom would be attacked if this was a white male making the reverse claim.</p>
<p>How do you feel about this statement coming from this white male:</p>
<p>&#8220;I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a latina female who hasn’t lived that life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Love it now? Want someone who said that in the highest court of the land?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

