This weekend Nick Kristof wrote a column called “Profiting from a Child’s Illiteracy” in which he suggested — without evidence — that a significant portion of American children who are receiving Social Security disability are doing so because their parents find it “easier” to collect government checks than to find and keep gainful employment. Describing their disabilities as “fuzzier” and “less clear-cut” than those of past generations, Kristof claimed that it is SSI, and the “huge stake in their failing” that it gives their parents, which “condemn[s]” them “to a life of poverty on the dole.”
Thirteen facts on those children, courtesy of the Social Security Administration:
- Fewer than thirty percent live with both parents.
- Half live in a household with at least one other person with a disability.
- Almost seventy percent saw a doctor three or more times in the last year.
- Nearly half visited an emergency room at least once in the last year.
- More than half have a disability described as “severe.”
- Forty-three percent have a physical disability.
- Eight percent are described as mentally retarded.
- Seventeen percent have had surgery in the last year.
- Among teenagers, nineteen percent are unable to bathe themselves.
- Thirty-six percent of those requiring mental health care are not receiving it.
- Seventy-four percent of guardians reporting a need for respite care are not receiving it.
- A quarter of those needing disability-specific transportation assistance are not receiving it.
- Their average total family income from all sources is $1,818 a month.
Update | Here are some more welcome facts on SSI, and on Kristof’s wrongheaded attacks on the program.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 10, 2012 at 5:25 pm
joanjohnston@nyc.rr.com
Thanks, Ang, for doing the research-his report is from Breathitt County (where your Tyra ancestors came from) which, I believe has one of the lowest income levels in KY, BUT, as I understand it, it’s much more difficult to get SSI for children under 18, BECAUSE IT -DOES- DEPEND ON THE FAMILY INCOME, so they look into each case carefully, (maybe even more so than for adults like Lindsay who we didn’t apply for until she turned 21), so I doubt that many are collecting illegally. Also, It seems to me that if you’ve got a kid with a disability, you need more help than you can get from working at a minimum wage job, even if you can find one. And …what does it have to do with illiteracy of the -children-? Actually, a lot of those very low income people are marginally literate themselves which makes it difficult for them to support their children becoming literate – even if, unlike your sister, they might be able to. Thanks, Mom
December 10, 2012 at 9:05 pm
Nicholas Kristof is an irresponsible moron | MattBruenig | Politics
[…] Johnston, methodological innovator of our times, decided to just read through the data the Social Security Administration collects on this program. The SSA’s survey also tells a […]
December 11, 2012 at 12:53 pm
In Which the Class War Is Alive and Well | Considered Exclamations
[…] do, and actually read the stats on Supplemental Security from the Social Security Administration. He found the following facts about the 1.1% of children who depend on […]