In the next few weeks, I’m going to be cleaning out my bookmark folders from 2008 and passing along some of the news and links that I didn’t get around to posting last year. Starting with this…

Back in December, I mentioned an organization called Choose Responsibility in passing, calling it “a drinking-age reform group that arose out of college administrators’ frustration with the status quo.”

In August, Choose Responsibility unveiled a statement on the drinking age that declared that “Twenty-one is not working.” The statement was signed by more than a hundred college and university presidents, a list that at this writing has grown to 134.

See the full text of the statement after the jump, or click through to The Amethyst Initiative to learn more.

It’s time to rethink the drinking age

In 1984 Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, which imposed a penalty of 10% of a state’s federal highway appropriation on any state setting its drinking age lower than 21.

Twenty-four years later, our experience as college and university presidents convinces us that…

Twenty-one is not working

A culture of dangerous, clandestine “binge-drinking”—often conducted off-campus—has developed.

Alcohol education that mandates abstinence as the only legal option has not resulted in significant constructive behavioral change among our students.

Adults under 21 are deemed capable of voting, signing contracts, serving on juries and enlisting in the military, but are told they are not mature enough to have a beer.

By choosing to use fake IDs, students make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law.

How many times must we relearn the lessons of prohibition?

We call upon our elected officials:

To support an informed and dispassionate public debate over the effects of the 21 year-old drinking age.

To consider whether the 10% highway fund “incentive” encourages or inhibits that debate.

To invite new ideas about the best ways to prepare young adults to make responsible decisions about alcohol.

We pledge ourselves and our institutions to playing a vigorous, constructive role as these critical discussions unfold.