You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Administration’ category.
The last of a group of students who had been occupying a grove of trees on the University of California Santa Cruz campus abandoned their protest site on Saturday. The protesters had been sitting in on three platforms in the redwood and oak grove since November 2007 to block construction of a biomedical facility on the site.
Three of the four protesters left the site before police arrived on Saturday morning, and the fourth was taken into custody. By noon the site had been fenced off and university employees were preparing to begin work cutting down the trees.
The regents of Iowa’s three public universities have approved new policies for the investigation of campus sexual misconduct in the wake of a bungled response to a sexual assault complaint at the University of Iowa last fall.
In September of this year, an independent investigation found that administrators had mishandled an incident in which a student claimed that two football players raped her in a dorm room. According to the report, the university failed to provide complete and coherent information to the student throughout the complaint and investigation process and acted ineffectually in responding to her reports of harassment on campus after she filed the complaint.
In the past six months two UI faculty members have committed suicide while under investigation for sexual misconduct. In August, a political science professor shot himself while facing criminal prosecution for soliciting sexual favors from four students in exchange for grades, and in November a music professor asphyxiated himself after a former student sued him for sexual harassment.
Back in the spring, Arkansas law professor Richard Peltz brought a defamation lawsuit against two law students who had circulated a letter accusing him of racism in the classroom. At the time, the students’ lawyer argued that a charge of racist behavior, “in the context of public discourse at a law school,” was not grounds for legal action.
Peltz requested and received an investigation of his actions by administrators, and in October the school’s interim dean gave Peltz a letter stating that his investigation had revealed “no evidence that you are or have been a racist … during your employment at the law school.”
Saying that he brought the lawsuit to force the university to take a stand on his behavior, Peltz then dropped the suit and circulated a nine-page memo responding to the charges that had been made against him.
Jan Kemp, an English professor at the University of Georgia who exposed exploitation of student athletes in the 1980s, leading to reforms in NCAA eligibility policies, has died of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Kemp was fired by UGA in the early 1980s for refusing to inflate the grades of varsity athletes who were in some cases functionally illiterate. When she sued the university for wrongful dismissal, the university’s academic policies were themselves put on trial.
In one of the most damning pieces of evidence, an audiotape was introduced on which the head of remedial studies at UGA could be heard telling fellow professors that student athletes were “a kind of raw material in the production of some goods to be sold as whatever product, and they get nothing in return.”
Kemp was reinstated as a result of that trial, and awarded more than one million dollars in damages. The verdict led to the resignation of the university’s president, and to new academic standards for athletes at UGA and in the NCAA as a whole.
The parents of two Washington State cheerleaders are suing their daughters’ high school for suspending them from the squad after nude photographs of the students began to circulate in the school. The students say that the two photos were distributed inadvertently.
The families charge that school officials allowed staffers to view the photos unnecessarily and that the school should have promptly reported the incident to police as a possible child pornography case.
The lawsuit also contends that the two girls were inappropriately targeted for punishment. It notes that students who may have received or forwarded the photographs, including members of the school’s football team, were not disciplined.
A school official is quoted as saying that “when you sign up to be a cheerleader — or for any student activity — you agree to certain codes of behavior.” “We consider them student leaders,” she continued, “and we want them to be role models.”
I’d want to know more about this particular case before coming to any real conclusions about it, but it does seem to me that distributing a naked picture of a fellow student without permission is a far more serious offense than taking a picture of yourself naked. That fact leaves me sympathetic to the plaintiffs in this suit, and inclined to believe that they’re raising important questions about school policy.
Update: Having done a brief search for additional reporting on this lawsuit, I have to add that I find media outlets’ eagerness to augment their coverage of this story with photographs of cheerleaders — from this high school, in uniform, with their faces blurred out — frankly repulsive.
studentactivism.net 
Recent Comments