You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Finances’ category.
The internet is abuzz with the news that Rutgers paid MTV reality star Snooki more ($32,000) for an appearance than it paid celebrated author Toni Morrison ($30,000). Morrison is delivering the commencement address at Rutgers’ graduation exercises this year, while Snooki did two shows on campus last night. And I’ve got to say, I’m more troubled by Morrison’s paycheck than Snooki’s. Here’s why:
Commencement addresses are traditionally given free or at reduced rates. This is, in fact, the first time in history that Rutgers has paid a graduation speaker. It turns out that the university recently renovated its football stadium, and wants to christen it with a blockbuster graduation event.
There’s a difference in funding, as well. Snooki was booked by a student-run, student-funded programming board whose money comes from student activity fees. The Rutgers University Programming Association exists for the sole purpose of bringing entertainment to campus, and by all accounts this was a popular booking — both of Snooki’s shows were standing-room-only. (Snooki’s fee won’t all go to her, by the way. Her two shows were in a mock interview format, and her interviewer, comedian Adam Ace, charges $2500 for solo appearances.)
Morrison’s fee, on the other hand, is being paid out of revenue from the university’s vendor contract with Pepsi. That money is being drawn out of a fund that is administered at the president’s discretion. It’s not a programming budget. It’s university money. Though Rutgers made a point in media coverage of saying that it didn’t dip into state funds or tuition to pay Morrison, that strikes me as a distinction without a difference, because if they hadn’t used the $30,000 this way, they would have had it available for something else.
I’m not saying — quite — that it’s a bad idea to give Toni Morrison $30,000 to deliver a commencement address, although it does seem a little weird to me to turn the awarding of an honorary doctorate into a paid gig. I’m just saying it’s not obvious to me that universities spending university money on a big-name speaker so they can justify holding graduation in a football stadium is a better idea than students spending student fees on programming that students are interested in.
The web journal Inside Higher Ed is a go-to source for anyone interested in the American university. Founded in 2004 as a competitor to the well-regarded but stodgy Chronicle of Higher Education, IHE is an indespensible daily guide to the nation’s campuses.
So why isn’t it covering the biggest student story of the year?
We’re now five days into the wave of student protest that has engulfed California since the UC regents approved huge fee increases for their system’s students. Since then thousands have demonstrated on campuses across the state, often clashing with police. Six university buildings at five universities have been occupied. More than a hundred students have been arrested. And IHE has given the story a total of four words.
“As students protested outside, the University of California’s Board of Regents on Thursday reluctantly approved a 32 percent increase in ‘fees’ …” That’s how the IHE opened a one-paragraph piece on the fee increases in its “Quick Takes” section on Friday. That one clause, “as students protested outside,” was the only mention of student organizing in the piece, and the IHE has yet to return to the topic.
At the time the IHE put up that story, students had taken over four UC buildings in response to the fee hikes. Three of those occupations were still ongoing as of Friday morning, and the fourth had ended with mass arrests. Fourteen students had been arrested within the regents meeting itself, and several — despite UCLA’s initial denials — had been Tasered by campus police during the demonstrations that accompanied it. After the meeting, students blockaded the building in which it had been held, blocking the regents’ exit and at one point compelling them to abandon the van in which they were attempting to leave campus.
Since Friday morning, IHE has covered a lawsuit filed by a woman who was fired by the University of Nebraska when they learned she was a witch. It has published a lengthy piece on academic plagiarism. It has written about a physical fitness requirement for obese students at Lincoln University and an athletics director who quit after applying for reimbursement for expenses relating to an extramarital affair. It has run two stories on tax issues.
But on the largest student uprising in recent American history? Nothing so far.
Now, granted, it’s Sunday, and IHE generally doesn’t publish on the weekends. Only one of the stories I list above went up yesterday, and that one was a blog post. But as I say, this was a huge story by Friday morning, and it only got bigger as that day went on.
I’ll be eager to see what they have on it tomorrow.
Monday morning update | Well, it’s tomorrow, and IHE has a 108-word “Quick Takes” story up reporting on Friday’s events at three universities.
The piece makes no mention of the 52 arrests at UC Davis on Thursday, and declares that UCSC’s Kerr Hall “remains occupied,” even though that occupation ended on Sunday morning. Meanwhile, the journal finds room for 645 words on the end of football at Northeastern.
It’s 10:30 am in California, and there’s already been a huge amount of activity surrounding the UC Regents’ UCLA meeting to approve huge increases in University of California fees.
Public comment on the fee proposal was the first item on the Regents’ agenda this morning, and UC Student Regent-designate Jesse Chang has been liveblogging events as they happened.
Originally scheduled for just twenty minutes, that time was doubled, and then extended again when the Regents moved to end it while four speakers were waiting for their turn at the microphone — students interrupted the meeting with chants until the chair agreed to allow the last four speakers to be heard.
When the chanting continued even after those speakers, the Regents moved to clear the room. According to Twitter reports, they recessed and left the hearing room while police dispersed the crowd. Eight attendees refused to leave and were arrested.
There’s lots more going on today — a mass rally against the fee hikes is scheduled for noon — and I’ll be updating with news as I get it.
10:40 am | The Mercury News is confirming reports of eight arrests at the meeting. The police say the eight were booked for unlawful assembly and will be released.
10:45 am | I’ve set up a Twitter list of people posting on the meeting and related protests. Please feel free to suggest feeds I should add.
10:55 am | The UCLA Daily Bruin has a live video feed of the meeting.
11:15 am | A group of students stood in the viewing section of the Regents’ meeting room a few minutes after eleven and began singing “We Shall Overcome” alternating with “We Are Not Afraid.” Meeting went into recess, and police arrested the singers. Many students in the viewing area raised fists in solidarity, breaking into cheers of support as the last of the group was arrested.
11:30 am | Number of new arrestees put at six by local media. Chair of Regents committee warned that if there was another disruption the room would be cleared completely. Two students now addressing the committee, opposing the increases.
12:05 pm | Public galleries just cleared after another blowup. Cops declared the gallery an unlawful assembly. Emotional conversation between student protesters and student regents right before the room was cleared.
1:05 pm | Student Regent Designate Jesse Cheng left the meeting room with the students who were expelled, while Student Regent Jesse Bernal stayed inside for the vote. He was the only regent to vote “no.” Cheng is now back inside, continuing to liveblog the meeting.
1:10 pm | Conflicting information circulating about police activity in connection with the protest outside the meeting. Several reports of taserings on Twitter, but the Daily Bruin says the administration officials deny that tasers have been used. Trying to get confirmation of other claims.
1:50 pm | A UCLA press release says that twelve of the fourteen people arrested inside the meeting today were students. The same press release estimates the size of the crowd outside at five hundred, and says that one protester was injured and taken to the hospital.
1:55 pm | The Daily Bruin is reporting on Twitter that protesters outside the Regents’ meeting are planning to block all exits to the building at three o’clock.
Pittsburgh mayor Luke Ravenstahl is moving forward with a plan to impose a one percent tax on college tuition, and he’s citing universities’ willingness to gouge their students as justification.
“When you look at some of the fees these places charge,” Ravenstahl told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, “we think it’s only fair to include a fee for the city.” Ravenstahl pointed to “charges for everything from athletic facility use to orientation to security,” the paper said.
A member of the Pittsburgh city council has introduced a proposal to charge universities a set amount for city services, but such a scheme would depend on voluntary compliance by the institutions, which is unlikely. Mayor Ravenstahl freely admits that students represent a softer target — as tax exempt institutions, universities are protected from such schemes.
In the last two days German students have launched lecture hall occupations at the Universities of Heidelberg, Munster, and Potsdam in solidarity with the Austrian student protests that have been going on for the last two weeks.
The German student demonstrators’ website can be found here. (A Google translation can be found here.)
The site’s name, “unsereunis,” is taken from one of the slogans of the Austrian student movement, and translates as “our universities.” Alongwith #unibrennt, #unsereunis is one of the major Twitter hashtags for the movement.
More news as I get it.
studentactivism.net 
Recent Comments