Every once in a while I post about the latest high-profile bad scholarship on youth and students. There’s all sorts of crap social science writing out there, but in this particular field what makes a splash is research that reinforces prejudices about young people — that they’re narcissists, that they’re overly entitled, that they drink too much, that they’re having too much sex too soon.

That last one is a biggie. Ask any middle-aged person about young people’s sexuality, and chances are they’ll bend your ear about how young people are having sex earlier, more casually, and more recklessly than ever before. You’ll hear all about “the hook-up culture,” and rainbow parties, and so on and on.

But there’s no evidence of any such shift, and in fact all the data we have points in the other direction.

Here’s a great write-up of what we know about heterosexual teen sexual activity. Compared to twenty years ago, teen girls aged 15-19 are 20% more likely to report being virgins, and boys the same age are more than 25% more likely. Three-quarters of girls who have had sex say they were in a serious relationship when they lost their virginity.

This is all self-reported, of course, but it’s backed up by hard data. Teen pregnancy rates have plummeted since the mid-1990s, after holding steady for the previous two decades. Today’s teenagers are just half as likely to get pregnant before their eighteenth birthday as their parents’ generation was, and as a result both teen abortion rates and teen motherhood have dropped dramatically.

Other studies demonstrate that media reports about an epidemic of casual, predatory oral sex among young teens are similarly unfounded. Most teenagers who report having had oral sex say they’ve also had intercourse, and that they started both activities at about the same time. And the vast majority of teens of either gender who say they’ve given oral sex say they’ve received it as well. (These numbers are from 2002. Data from a 2006-08 survey should be available soon, and I’ll pass those stats on when I get them.)

Oh, and the percent of teens aged 15-19 who report having used contraception the last time they had intercourse has risen from 84.2% in 1988 to 93.3% in 2006-08, with condom use soaring from 53.3% to 78.8%. In the same time period, the number of teens reporting that they used condoms and the pill more than doubled, to 35.3%.

So, to sum up: Today’s teens are having intercourse later than their parents’ generation, and taking safer sex precautions far more consistently. They’re getting pregnant less and having fewer abortions. They’re having intercourse and oral sex mostly in the context of committed relationships, and the vast majority of them are reporting that their sexual experiences have been reciprocal.

But don’t look for any of this info on the nightly news.

For real this time. All sorts of great stuff in the pipeline.

For the last couple of months I’ve been helping to facilitate a weekly Twitter discussion on student government called #sgachat. This week’s chat (details here) was on the “student issues” issue — the question of which topics are appropriate for student governments to take on. Should student governments confine themselves to working on “student issues” only, and if so, what is a student issue anyway?

The whole chat is well worth reading, but as I was looking it over I realized that my own contributions to it, posted from the @studentactivism Twitter account, added up to a sort of mini-essay, written in 140-character bursts. Not the most eloquent thing I’ve ever written, but for those who are interested in the subject, it may have some appeal, so here goes…

The “student issue” debate has been around for 75+ years, and activists have answered it in a variety of interesting ways.

Most major student movements have arisen from students addressing big social issues through campus channels.

ROTC in NYC in 1930s. Free (political) speech at Berkeley 1964. Community relations Columbia 1968.

Repro health services on campus 1970s. Apartheid divestment 1980s. Living wage 1990s. Sweatshops 2000s.

All huge social issues, all with a campus angle.

The campus is a home, a school, a workplace, a clinic, a library, a park, a lab. What issues DON’T affect the campus?

Some student govts have always been politically/socially conscious, others not. That’s a whole huge history of its own.

One epidemic problem for student govts is passing resolutions instead of organizing. Big Important Questions invite such posturing.

Student government posturing and resolution-writing is often weakness and despair masquerading as bravado.

Build student govts to do important work on campus and beyond, and writing resolutions will lose its allure.

Student govts shouldn’t need consensus to act, but they shouldn’t deepen campus divisions lightly.

If 70% are with you and 30% are against, part of your task is reaching out to that 30%.

One lesson I learned via my first year in student govt: Other students are almost never your real adversary.

Nothing pleases the people with real power on campus more than students organizing against students.

When students see student govt as effective on issues they care about, “student issues” debates will fade.

Final advice for student govts… In the immortal words of RuPaul, “I got one thing to say. You better WORK.”

“Once social change begins, it cannot be reversed. You cannot un-educate the person who has learned to read. You cannot humiliate the person who feels pride. You cannot oppress the people who are not afraid anymore.”

–Cesar Chavez

In the last two days, both of my parents have emailed to ask why I haven’t updated since my “I’ll be back after the weekend” post.

This is me posting to day I’m not dead in a ditch, and I’ll be back with some very cool stuff very soon.

About This Blog

n7772graysmall
StudentActivism.net is the work of Angus Johnston, a historian and advocate of American student organizing.

To contact Angus, click here. For more about him, check out AngusJohnston.com.