There’s a good short post up at the law blog The Volokh Conspiracy on the do’s and don’ts of bringing a speaker to campus. (It’s intended for Federalist Society clubs, but most of the advice is universal.)

Here’s the meat of it:

  • Debates seem to get more of a turnout than lectures.

  • If you can’t set up a head-to-head debate, set up a two-person panel, or a talk-plus-commentary.

  • Events that involve a local professor — a debate, a panel, or even the professor’s just introducing a guest speaker — will probably get more of a turnout.

  • Publicize, publicize, publicize, using all the tools at your disposal — e-mail, flyers in mailboxes, postings on bulletin boards, postings on class chalkboards, if your school allows that, and whatever else you can think of.

  • For topics, the usual sexy ones are good: affirmative action, gun control, abortion, church-state separation, campaign finance, and the like. Other topics can work as well, especially if you can find a well-known visitor. But generally speaking the old standards work well.

  • If you want to bring in a relatively prominent speaker from out of town, offer to coordinate with other chapters in your city, so that the speaker can give several talks on one trip.

  • Provide lunch — the better, the better.

    June 4 update: Although it wasn’t the point of this post, I should probably mention that I’m available for campus speaking engagements myself.

  • A tongue-in-cheek call for a campus club to “advocate for men in the same manner that female groups advocate for women” has resulted in the formation of a men’s advocacy organization at the University of Chicago.

    Back in March, UC junior Steve Saltarelli wrote an op-ed in the Chicago Maroon announcing the creation of Men in Power, a new student group founded “to spread awareness and promote understanding of issues and challenges facing men today.” Proposing “a tutorial on barbecuing” and “fishing, hunting, and flag-football retreats” as club activities, Saltarelli soon started receiving emails from men looking to join.

    So he set it up. MiP applied for official campus recognition and funding, and held its first meeting in mid-May.

    The Chicago Tribune had no trouble finding men’s rights activists to cheer the group’s creation and feminists to deplore it, but it remains unclear just how serious Saltarelli is. His Maroon op-ed was an obvious spoof — “many don’t realize that men are in power all around us,” he noted, pointing out that “the last 44 presidents have been men.” But if the club itself is a hoax, it’s a subtle one, as interviews like this one make clear.

    That said, the club is clearly uncomfortable with the charges of misogyny (and douchebaggery) that are directed its way. Its Facebook group and website each include a prominent notice that those “looking for a (white) male champion group that seeks to advance men at the expense of women and/or a clique to isolate yourselves … are in the wrong place.”

    Links posted at the group’s Twitter feed make clear that it’s garnering quite a bit of media attention, but its first meeting drew fewer than twenty attendees. If it exists as a functioning campus group a year from now, I’ll be more than a little surprised.

    Update: Okay, here’s my hunch. Saltarelli wrote the original Maroon piece as a not-feminist-but-not-antifeminist-either goof. He wasn’t serious about creating the group. But then he started getting attention, and he liked the attention, so he decided to go for it. And then he started getting a lot of attention, and a lot of questions he’d never really contemplated, and he had to start figuring out how to answer them. And now he, and the rest of the group, are trying to come up with a serious rationale for a project that didn’t start out serious, and negotiating some heavy gender politics that they don’t have a lot of tools to address.

    (There are a lot of parallels here to the Veterans of Future Wars craze of 1936. I should really get some of the stuff I’ve written about those folks up online.)

    These nine statements were the basis of my presentation at the NYC Grassroots Media Conference this afternoon. (And yes, they’re all 140 characters or less.)

    1. IT’S EASY. It’s simple to join Twitter, and simple to post. You can do it at the spur of the moment.

    2. IT’S IMMEDIATE. Readers will see what you write in minutes. If you’re making news, Twitter gets your news out NOW.

    3. IT’S OPEN. Anyone interested in what you’re doing can find you, and you can find people talking about the same stuff.

    4. IT’S CONNECTED. Twitter encourages conversation and builds relationships. It lets you make contacts outside your circle.

    5. IT’S FLEXIBLE. Twitter lets you integrate media. You can post photos, video, links, blog content, use it as message board, chatroom.

    6. IT’S CONCISE. 140 characters forces you to speak clearly and forcefully to an open-ended audience.

    7. IT’S CUMULATIVE. Twitter followers tend to be “sticky,” so connections accumulate without intensive effort.

    8. IT’S SUSTAINABLE. Blogging can be a chore, but since you don’t need to maintain by regular posting, Twitter isn’t an energy suck.

    9. IT’S NEW. Nobody knows for sure where it’s going, and lots of folks are eager to find out. That’s an opening, in all sorts of ways.


    A reminder: My panel at the NYC Grassroots Media Conference is tomorrow at 2:45 pm at Hunter College.

    Here’s the panel description:

    Student activists are constantly struggling to build community, and new media offer powerful tools for making that happen. Our workshop will explore the role of activist-produced media in creating news, transforming existing narratives, and empowering students in the university and the larger society. The panel will consider the role of alternative and mainstream media in recent organizing at CUNY, NYU and the New School, examine how activists can make effective use of Facebook, Twitter and other social media tools, and illuminate how educators can bring activist-produced video into the classroom.

    Our lineup is going to include folks talking about the use of blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube in student organizing, and our presenters are a mix of undergrads, grad students, and others. It’s going to be a great session, and if you make it out, be sure to come say hi afterwards.

    The whole conference is looking great, and it’s ridiculously cheap, so if you’re going to be in NYC tomorrow and you’re not already booked, you should be sure to stop by.

    Saturday morning update: Conference tweeting is at the #nycgm hashtag. A photo of me is up here, if you’d like to say hi.

    On CNN yesterday, former GOP Congressman Tom Tancredo said that the National Council of La Raza, the Latino civil rights organization of which Judge Sonia Sotomayor is a member, is “a Latino KKK without the hoods or the nooses.” His evidence?

    The logo of La Raza is ‘All for the race. Nothing for the rest.’

    One big problem with that. The motto of the National Council of La Raza is “Strengthening America by promoting the advancement of Latino families.” (Their logo, if anyone’s wondering, can be seen in this photo of John McCain’s speech to their 2008 national convention.)

    Oops.

    The phrase Tancredo had in mind, “Por La Raza todo, fuera de La Raza nada,” appears in a 1969 poem/manifesto associated with the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (MEChA), a Chicano student activist group.

    MEChA is a loose federation of campus-based student organizations, some more radical than others. California politician Cruz Bustamente was a MEChA member as an undergraduate at Fresno State University in the 1970s, and he got in hot water with conservatives during his 2003 campaign for governor for refusing to repudiate the group.

    MEChA and NCLR could hardly be more different.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    About This Blog

    n7772graysmall
    StudentActivism.net is the work of Angus Johnston, a historian and advocate of American student organizing.

    To contact Angus, click here. For more about him, check out AngusJohnston.com.