I’m still looking for more news on the windup and aftermath of the campus occupation that ended yesterday at the University of California at Santa Cruz, but in the meantime I want to clear something up.
In an article published yesterday in City on a Hill Press, a UCSC student newspaper, one of the students sitting in at the Graduate Commons building said that UCSC had just “broken a record for longest student occupation of a building to take place in America post-1960s.” A couple of days ago, an occupation spokesperson made a slightly less extravagant version of the claim, saying that the Commons sit-in was “one of the longest student occupations in many, many years.”
So is it true? Was the UCSC occupation the longest campus building takeover since the heyday of student activism in the sixties?
Well, no. Here are five that were longer, one of which — the UNC sweatshop sit-in pictured above — happened just a year and a half ago:
- At Harvard in 2001, a sit-in demanding that university employees be paid a living wage lasted for three weeks.
- Another living wage sit-in, this one at Washington University in 2005, lasted for eighteen days.
- In May of last year, students protesting the University of North Carolina’s ties to sweatshop garment makers occupied the lobby of their administration building for sixteen days.
- In 1989, students occupied the administration building at Wayne State University for either eleven or twelve days in response to racist incidents on campus.
- The Afrikan Student Union at Ohio State University occupied the offices of the campus president for eight days in 1998 in protest of proposed changes in the Office of Minority Affairs.
Claims that a certain protest was the biggest, or longest, or most dramatic, since the sixties are common, and almost always wrong. They’re common because we think of the sixties as being the last time there was a real student movement in the United States, and they’re wrong because their conception of the history of American student activism is wrong.
I knew about a couple of the campus protests listed above before I sat down to write this post, but most of them I uncovered by Googling. They don’t add up to anything like a comprehensive list of the last few decades’ multi-week campus sit-ins. They represent a small slice of a story that’s mostly gone untold in recent years — the story of American students’ persistent ongoing local campus organizing. I mention them not to mock the UCSC folks or belittle their protest, but because the more activists know about past struggles, the better equipped they’ll be to take on the future.
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 2, 2009 at 9:35 pm
ForStudentPower
Thanks for this post – some are loathe to acknowledge that there was a student movement in the 90s.
This sort of media-inspired pissing contest is not only silly, but it masks the true measure of any action – whether the goals of it were achieved. I’ll take a 3 hour occupation that unites a campus and wins most of its demands over a two-week occupation that ends in police batons or hollow promises.
October 3, 2009 at 1:30 am
bradley
Yes, thank you for this post. I hadn’t read that claim online, but yesterday a UCSC student said it to me after the occupation had come to an end, and a protest against the high price of textbooks didn’t materialize. It’s unfortunate the irresponsible claims were made during interviews. I’m glad that this post is raising awareness. And of course, there is still plenty of room for more critique of the occupation.. I was at the dance party on Wednesday night for a couple hours and wrote a bit about it.
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/10/01/18624103.php
In one way, it is encouraging to see people taking creative action within the corrupt institution. I also believe it would be useful for there to be some published analysis and critique of the occupation from the occupiers.
October 3, 2009 at 5:17 am
alum
Thx for this post! As a UCSC Alum, I was very glad to see the protests across the UC system, as well as the occupation in Santa Cruz. But I am frequently disheartened when people (particularly those in the media) consistently forget the almost non-stop student (and community) organizing that took place between the 70s and today.
We won many improvements from these campaigns, and have fought hard to maintain programs that were established in previous years. It seems that every year various administrators have sought to dismantle programs like Ethnic Studies, Womens Studies, Outreach and Retention of underrepresented students, and more. The continued existence (albeit limited and constantly under siege) of these programs is a testament to the student movements of this period that everyone forgets so easily. This is particularly true at UCSC (you can read a timeline of UCSC activist history here: http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/11/08/18459259.php)
It’s unfortunate that the ’60s has become the litmus test for whether something is successful or not. Movements since, many of which were deeply rooted in student movements, have created just as important changes. Do we forget the struggle against Apartheid in South Africa – where UC divestment played an important role? Or the environmentalist/nuclear-free movement that effectively halted the construction of new nuclear power facilities in many parts of the U.S.? Or even as recent as the antiwar movement prior to the invasion of Iraq? Campuses were abuzz with protest, of course including UCSC – which later built a name for itself by keeping the campus military-recruitment free for over 2 years, through direct action and other tactics (and getting spied on by the Pentagon in the process). Finally (to name just one more), have we already forgotten the historic May Day marches of 2006 – with millions of students and workers uniting in cities and towns across the country, standing up for immigrant rights.
Again, all of this is not to belittle those like Lakoff who talk of a resurgence of activism t Berkeley, or those at Santa Cruz who ignore their obvious disconnect with the larger student body to tout the historic nature of their self-described militancy. At all times, and especially today, we need student activists to take bold measures and fight for change. But we should not forget the almost half-decade since the 60s, and all the lessons learned since; developing accountable organizations, broad popular support, coalition building, and more. I
October 3, 2009 at 11:32 am
Angus Johnston
I think there’s definitely something to be said for the idea of an open-ended, no-demands occupation, and in that kind of an action staying power is something to be happy about for its own sake. But yeah, a quick action can be, and often is, more productive than a drawn out one, and knowing when it’s time to pack up is absolutely crucial too.
I also agree that the “we set a record” way of thinking of things is more than a little silly. I didn’t mention it in my post, but in 1985 an anti-apartheid protest at UC Berkeley occupied the front steps of Sproul Hall for SIX WEEKS. Not technically a building takeover, because it was outside, but at the same time, it was outside. I’m all for talking about what the longest/biggest/whateverest action at a given campus was, because that establishes historical context, but once you start talking on a national scale, it devolves into trivia.
October 3, 2009 at 11:34 am
Angus Johnston
Thanks for the link. Good stuff. And yes, I agree that there’s room for critique of the occupation, if for no other reason than to move thinking forward. It’s clear that the UCSC folks managed to avoid some of the traps that the NYU and New School occupiers stepped into last year, and if the next occupation can learn from UCSC, that’s fantastic.
October 3, 2009 at 11:39 am
Angus Johnston
That timeline is amazing — what a wonderful document. I may need to do a whole post just about it. And I absolutely agree that there’s not just an ongoing tradition of campus activism since the sixties, but a coherent history — from the student power struggles, student lobbies, and cultural and area studies campaigns of the seventies on forward to the anti-sweatshop organizing and other movements of today. There are narratives there to be laid out, and folks are beginning to write them. I see this blog as a part of that project as much as anything else.
Thanks again.
November 19, 2009 at 11:39 pm
OakesFolks
What about the occupation of the library at UCSC in 1984 or 85 over divestment from Apartheid South Africa? Didn’t that count?