The facultyosphere has been buzzing recently about this YouTube video of a young prof’s public comment at a meeting of the University of Minnesota board of regents. Just three minutes long, the clip presents an powerful case against the budget cuts that have been sweeping the UM system — and the nation.
It should be said that Eva Von Dassow, a professor of Classical and Near Eastern Studies, has a somewhat theatrical delivery. She goes in for language a little more flowery than you’ll see at most student protests — “financial stringency leaves undiminished the numbers of vice presidents, not to mention the salaries of top coaches” is a representative passage, and the words “etiolated” and “verbigeration” make appearances in her speech.
But her arguments are impassioned, informed, and convincing. “The present financial crisis” is, she says, being “deployed … as a tool for starving certain parts of the university in order to feed others.”
What we’re facing in American higher education today is not merely a retrenchment but a restructuring. Von Dassow lays out the facts of that restructuring cogently, and with an admirable focus on the undergraduate experience.
Her speech is well worth a listen.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 4, 2010 at 11:19 am
M John Love
Wow, well said.
August 4, 2010 at 11:34 am
CampusCaucus
My only critique of the speech is regarding her critique of top coaches salaries. Athletics is unique in that many of the major Division I schools have self-sufficient budgets; meaning that the football and basketball programs bring in far more money to the university than they spend and that pays for all coach salaries (including those for not as financially solvent sports like gymnastics, soccer, and track) and facilities (stadiums, practice areas, etc). Usually, the extra revenue that is over an above that mark is used to provide scholarships for prospective athletes.
However, her argument remains valid at lower level institutions but I don’t believe that they are paid as highly so the budgetary impact is likely not the same. I could be wrong though.
Other than the bit about the athletics which I disagree with, it certainly was impassioned.