The comment thread from Sarah Palin’s Facebook post on yesterday’s Tucson shooting, as it looked this morning at 8:35 am:
Same thread, six minutes later:
The comments from which the above Giffords quote was taken were made on MSNBC in March 2010, and can be found in full here.
Update | I should say a bit about why I posted that quote on Palin’s site, I guess. Commenters there have gone far beyond the (reasonable) claim that Palin’s rhetoric had no direct connection to yesterday’s tragedy — they’re claiming that Palin used no violent rhetoric at all, and that the current criticism of Palin’s speech is just after-the-fact piling on. I think that’s not just false, but demonstrably false, and it seemed to me that Gabrielle Giffords’ own words, spoken almost a year ago, were the best way of showing that.
The question of what role Palin’s words and images — and those of her friends and allies — played in yesterday’s events will be debated at length in the weeks to come, and may never be satisfactorily answered. But it is a fact that Gabrielle Giffords was the target of a sustained campaign of political violence and harassment in the last year. It is a fact that she drew explicit connections between that campaign and the rhetoric of Sarah Palin. And it is a fact that she called for such reckless, inciteful speech to stop.
It’s a fact that Representative Giffords criticized Sarah Palin’s “gunsight” graphic ten months ago. And it’s a fact that Sarah Palin left that graphic up online until yesterday afternoon, when Giffords lay in critical condition in a hospital — and a federal judge, a Congressional staffer, an idealistic nine-year-old, and three other Americans lay dead.
It’s a fact.
Second Update | It’s worth noting that Palin’s people are perfectly happy to allow extremist rhetoric from the right to stand in comments at her facebook site. Take this comment, posted hours before mine and still (as of 10:48 am) up, for example:
“This guy was a Hitler worshipper, a pure socialist. If you want to blame anyone, try the left wing agenda. She was against the Obamacare and all the radical left. She was a moderate democrat. That is what made her a target of the left. I would not put it past Obama and his regime to have perpetrated this horrific action. Chicago politics at it finest.”
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 9, 2011 at 9:55 am
Angus Johnston
Sorry, Annie, but I deleted your comment. I may just have to shut down comments entirely on this post, like I did on the last. I’m not going to have time to moderate actively today, and I don’t want this turning into a screaming match while I’m gone.
January 9, 2011 at 2:00 pm
Hate Rhetoric of the Right / The Ave
[…] In the meantime, Ms. Palin has been scrubbing remarks form her Facebook enties: […]
January 9, 2011 at 2:58 pm
E. Gray
Right. Let’s review the last two years of political rhetoric from the Tea Partiers and the pandering Republicans who manipulate them http://wp.me/pNmlT-AK
January 9, 2011 at 5:51 pm
Queen of the Click
I thought the media was making this information up. No one would be stupid enough to post a map with crosshairs on it. I mean if a person went on Facebook and posted a map with crosshairs on it, surely they would be taken into police custody here in NYC.
But the map sits on Palins Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/dont-get-demoralized-get-organized-take-back-the-20/373854973434
After Gifford’s office had been shot at in March. http://kateoplis.tumblr.com/post/2655554409/msnbc-talks-to-rep-gabrielle-gifford-about-the
You would think she would have removed the Sarah Pac. Unbelieveable.
January 9, 2011 at 9:12 pm
bestcomment
The use of words like “evil,” “Nazi” etc, that the tea partiers apply to the President are sickening. Sometimes I think we should require a passing grade in civics & history before people should be allowed to vote.
January 10, 2011 at 3:47 am
H.D. COLE
With out hate could the TEA PARTY stay as a PARTY?
January 10, 2011 at 4:56 pm
nevada trust
you shouldn’t blame palin, we all need to take responsibility for the emergence of violent politics in the USA.
January 11, 2011 at 11:32 am
Nevada Distrust
Hi Nevada trust – surely you are kidding!
I’ve not heard of ANYONE else who actively encouraged violence agsinst a US Congresswmoman. If ANYONE posted pictures of the Quitter with crosshairs put over her face, the tea baggers would be foaming at the mouth.
Enough of trying to abdicate the Quitter of her actions. If she’s such a tough woman – she should stand up and re-post her original hate-filled pictures. Otherwise, she’s admitting guilt.
I’m surely not taking responsiblity for violence when I’ve never been involved in fommenting violence (as Plain has done) nor have I ever been invovled in violence. Stop trying to spread the guilt of the Quitter to rational, sane, educated people. the baggers wanted this – now they have it – but won’t own it. Par for the course.