After the scandal surrounding a CUNY administrator’s threat to dismantle the Queensborough Community College English department broke wide in the academic media yesterday, that administrator — a QCC vice president — sent a letter of apology to the department’s chair. That apology, and an accompanying letter to the college’s faculty, went further than a Sunday letter from the QCC president to disavow her initial threat, and to pledge greater respect for faculty involvement in governance in the future.
In her letter to faculty, QCC vice president Karen Steele expressed “deep regret” for last week’s missive, saying it was “over-dramatized” and “sent in haste.” There are, she said, “no plans to enact” the “hypothetical” cuts to the department she threatened, and she pledged to “work mightily … to ensure all our classes are available for students” and to ensure “continue[d] … support” for the “innovative work” of the QCC English department.
Aside from one sentence nodding to the college’s “responsibility to comply with the Board’s responsibility to comply with the Board’s policy and the guidelines issued under it,” there was no hint of the combativeness that had characterized her previous communications with the department, both in print and in her appearance at last week’s faculty meeting.
This isn’t a complete capitulation, since no final resolution to QCC’s Pathways dispute has yet been reached. But it’s a big step in that direction.
The full text of the Monday letter follows.
From: Steele, Karen B.
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 5:20 PM
To: _Faculty (Including CLT’s); _Adjuncts; _HEOs
Cc: _Cabinet Members; _Deans
Subject: Regarding my memo
Colleagues,
Yesterday I wrote to the English Department chair, Dr. Linda Reesman, apologizing for the email I sent her last Thursday regarding English Composition courses. I deeply regret having sent the original email, primarily because it was needlessly hurtful to members of the English Department and to other faculty as well. It was an email sent in haste, out of an over-dramatized fear of the possible impact on the department.
I would like to make clear that the items listed in the email were hypothetical, and there are no plans to enact them, and to echo the President’s letter: we will “work mightily” to ensure all of our classes are available for students, that faculty members in our English Department have plenty of classes to teach, and that they continue to have support for their innovative work.
At the same time, as a member of CUNY, we have the responsibility to comply with the Board’s policy and the guidelines issued under it.
It is the tradition at Queensborough for all groups at the college to work together to solve problems. My memo was not aligned with that tradition, and going forward I recommit to Queensborough’s outstanding tradition of the administration and the faculty striving together towards common goals.
As most of you know, the College community has been actively involved in work on restructuring our curricula to align with the CUNY Pathways Common Core, as approved by the Board, and with the Pathways majors. The first principle that we have all followed has been to preserve the standards of our existing programs, and faculty in all departments have expended tremendous effort preparing. It is my hope and expectation that we can continue to work together to accomplish this task that is so important for our students.
Karen
9 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 18, 2012 at 12:05 pm
Arts Squared
Thank you for your coverage of this unfortunate episode.
September 18, 2012 at 12:17 pm
CUNY administration backs down from threat to gut QCC English dept « Occupy CUNY – News
[…] reports that Queensborough Vice President Karen Steele has sent a letter of apology to the English […]
September 18, 2012 at 1:32 pm
Good News! « Clarissa's Blog
[…] CUNY’s Karen Steele has apologized for her threats to punish the members of the English department for exercising their academic […]
September 18, 2012 at 7:51 pm
What Makes Writing So Important? « The Cork Board
[…] the liberal arts model. Just this week, professors, students, and other stakeholders protested the threatened dissolution of the Queensborough Community College’s English Department at the City University of New York (CUNY). As a result of the tremendous outcry, a QCC vice […]
September 19, 2012 at 6:22 pm
Encouraging news from CUNY-Queensborough « Stop the Cuts at Emory
[…] of the administration. In that spirit, we’re glad to hear that the vice-president of QCC retracted her threats this Monday. We hope that institutions of all sorts will work toward open communication–in […]
September 19, 2012 at 6:38 pm
Xlp Thlplylp
This letter from Chancellor Matthew Goldstein explains that he would prefer that the administration force the Trustee approved changes down faculty throats without being overt assholes. Faculty have some technical matters of governance delegated to them, but make no mistake: faculty cannot stop the adoption of Pathways. He concludes with the assurance that the administration is trustworthy.
CUNY Newswire – September 19, 2012
A MESSAGE FROM CHANCELLOR GOLDSTEIN
I am writing to address several issues that have arisen recently in connection with the implementation of the Pathways resolution of the Board of Trustees.
First, earlier this month, the interim vice-president for academic affairs at Queensborough Community College wrote an unfortunate letter to the College’s English Department. The author subsequently apologized for the character and tone of her communication. We should remember that while Pathways established the structure for curricular reform and its implementation, faculty are fully engaged in developing course content. Such collaboration is very much in the tradition and spirit of a great University.
Second, Dr. Terrence Martell, chair of the University Faculty Senate, and Dr. Barbara Bowen, President of the Professional Staff Congress, have sent an email to the faculty in which they erroneously state that the faculty have the power to block the implementation of Pathways. This claim misstates the core principle, embodied in state law and the bylaws and policies of the University, that the authority for the governance of the University on all matters rests with the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has delegated a significant role to the faculty on academic matters, and the faculty have the right to exercise their professional judgment in fulfilling that role. However, the faculty are not empowered to ignore or violate a policy established by the Board of Trustees or the implementation of that policy by the Chancellor.
I hope this clarifies matters and allows us to continue to work collaboratively to implement Pathways in a manner that is in the best educational interests of our students.
Best wishes,
September 20, 2012 at 12:50 pm
Bill
Can anyone verify that the above e-mail from the chancellor was sent to CUNY faculty yesterday?
September 21, 2012 at 10:16 pm
Faculty vs. Administration: CUNY Queensborough « Adventures in (Post) Gradland
[…] UPDATE (Sept. 22): Seems like it’s time for a bit of backpedaling. […]
September 24, 2012 at 12:21 am
Anonymous
By now it should be common knowledge that the above CUNY Newswire email was sent to the CUNY community on the date indicated.