Students at the University of California and the California State University are already facing tuition increases for the fall semester. But new state budget cuts passed this week could mean an additional mid-year hike — and that’s if everything goes according to plan with the budget from here on out.

Tuition has more than tripled in California in the last decade, and fees are slated to rise another 8% at CSU and 10% at UC in the fall semester. State legislators just cut an additional $150 million each from UC and CSU, compounding a combined cut of $1 billion planned this spring. In total, the reductions amount to a more than 20% cut from just least year.

The just-passed budget assumes new revenues of $4 billion for the state which have not yet been approved. If those funds fail to materialize, UC and CSU stand to lose another $100 million each.

Yesterday the Supreme Court struck down a California law banning the sale of certain video games to children without their parents’ consent, and Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed. In a long and history-heavy dissent, he argued that minors properly have no First Amendment rights to read or view anything that their parents have not consented to let them access.

Strikingly, though, his dissent went even further, arguing that in early America — and thus, by his reading of the constitution, still today — “parents had a right to the child’s labor and services until the child reached majority,” and in fact to “complete authority” over their kids. That authority, he argues, remains in effect until the child reaches his or her 18th birthday.

Oh, and he also finds room to express doubt that video games are “speech” at all.

It’s worth noting that although three other justices disagreed with either the majority’s finding (Breyer) or its reasoning (Alito and Roberts), none co-signed Thomas’s wacky reading of the First Amendment.

 

I wrote this for a friend’s zine when my older daughter, now eight, was a few months old. Father’s day seems like as good a time as any to repost it.

My daughter Casey was born in January, and so far the singing-to-the-kid duties have mostly fallen on me. If I’d thought about it before she was born, I guess I’d have imagined that I’d have sung mostly kids’ songs — some Woody Guthrie, some of the lullabies that my folks sang to me — but it hasn’t worked out that way just yet.

I’m not quite sure how, but William Blake’s “Jerusalem” has wound up in heavy rotation, along with a slowed-down version of “Surfin’ Bird” that really seems to soothe her. If she’s pitching a fit, I usually sing whatever happens to pop into my head, or hum nonsense until it resolves itself into a recognizable melody (that’s how we ended up with the Blake, I think). Usually I don’t worry too much about the lyrics, even if they’re creepy or age-inappropriate — I can’t shelter her from “Psycho Killer” or “Cheap is How I Feel” forever. Not in this house.

There’s one song, though, that I’ve always felt strange singing to her, and it’s one of my (and, as much as one can tell these things, her) favorites — Buddy Holly’s “Well … All Right.”

I’ve loved that song for as long as I can remember. When I was a teenager, the diffidence of a love song with such a title tickled me, and a few years ago I realized that it’s got a dark undercurrent to it that’s really powerful. In Buddy’s rendition, it’s one overwhelmed kid singing to another, but if you imagine someone like Johnny Cash singing it — and singing it now, doing with it what he did with Nine Inch Nails’ “Hurt,” it becomes something weird and slightly sinister.

Well, all right — so I’m being foolish. It’s all right, let people know
About the dreams and wishes you wish, in the night when lights are low.

That’s nasty. It’s great, but it’s nasty. Hence my dilemma. And there are only twelve lines in the whole song — six, if you space them the way I did above — so I can’t do what every cowardly cover artist has ever done, and just skip the bits that make me uncomfortable.

About a month ago, though, something hit me. If you switch a few words around — just convert some ‘I’s and ‘we’s to ‘you’s and ‘your’s and make one or two plurals singular — the whole song changes. The singer steps out of the relationship, and suddenly he’s advising someone about an affair he’s not involved with. He’s an older-and-wiser friend. He’s a trusted counselor. He could even be … a father.

This is where my friend the shrink starts rolling her eyes and smiling indulgently when I tell her the story. The father-daughter relationship is intrinsically a romantic one, in her eyes, one whose great drama comes when the daughter hits puberty and throws dad over for some pimply dork — or worse, a dashing young prince or princess. But Casey’s not even crawling — I don’t have to deal with all that just yet.

What I do want to get started dealing with, though, even now, is sending her the message that she can and should be brave, and fearless, and take risks.

That although folks — maybe even me — are going to tell her she’s wrong and she doesn’t know what she’s doing, and though sometimes we’ll be right, and sometimes it’ll hurt like hell, she should be bold anyway, and love anyway, and believe anyway, and hurt anyway. In the long run it’ll be okay. It’ll be all right.

Well, all right — so you’re going steady. It’s all right, let people say
That that foolish kid can’t be ready for the love that comes her way.

Well, all right. Well, all right. You can live and love with all your might.
Well, all right. Well, all right. Your lifetime love will be all right.

Well, all right — so I’m being foolish. It’s all right, let people know
About the dreams and wishes you wish, in the night when lights are low.

Well, all right. Well, all right. You can live and love with all your might.
Well, all right. Well, all right. Your lifetime love will be all right.

Sweet dreams, Casey.

I keep meaning to post more, and it keeps not happening. I’m teaching a ridiculously compressed summer schedule right now — two full courses in three and a half weeks, which means three hours each, four days a week. So I’m in front of the classroom from nine to noon teaching the first half of world history, and then from noon to three teaching the second half. And then I’m completely exhausted.

And I’m with my kids for a chunk of the afternoon most days, and they’re here with me overnight one night a week and every other weekend, and right now that’s actually two weekends in a row, last weekend and this weekend. (And the Mermaid Parade is next weekend, so last weekend we were consumed with making costumes.) So there’s this one bubble early on Friday afternoons when I’ve got energy and time, and that’s exactly the moment when blogging on education and activism issues seems least productive.

More to come when it comes. In the meantime, hope you’re using your time and energy as whole-heartedly as I am.

About This Blog

n7772graysmall
StudentActivism.net is the work of Angus Johnston, a historian and advocate of American student organizing.

To contact Angus, click here. For more about him, check out AngusJohnston.com.