Daily Archive

My post transcribing a speech by “Allie,” a student arrested at Berkeley’s Wheeler Hall on Friday, has generated a lot of response. Many of the early comments, unfortunately, consisted of criticism of the student’s use of the word “fucking,” but as the day has worn on more serious questions have come to the forefront.

One commenter in particular raises objections that I’ve seen a lot around the internet in the last couple of days, and they’re objections that I’d like to take a few minutes to address. The material in italics in this post comes from “David,” and my responses are in regular type.

I don’t see why the girl in this audio clip is so outraged by the arrests. An occupation involves trespassing. That’s part of the point of occupying a building, rather than sitting on the grass.

That’s one point of occupying a building, yes, but it was hardly the only — or even the primary — point of this particular occupation. The Wheeler Hall occupiers didn’t just take over the building. They didn’t barricade themselves in and shut it down. They opened it up. They held concerts and scholarly talks and review sessions and knitting circles. They discussed university reform and the budget crisis and state politics. They turned Wheeler Hall into — as Allie said in her speech — an “alternative model” for the university community. That wouldn’t have been possible if they’d just been sitting on the grass.

Violating the rules wasn’t the point of Wheeler Hall, and in fact some of the Wheeler occupiers were under the impression that they weren’t breaking the rules. On Tuesday evening word went out that the university had given the students permission to use the space through Friday, and students have said that they relied on those assurances when they made the decision to participate in the occupation. Yes, officials say they announced that the occupation wasn’t officially sanctioned, but that announcement was apparently taken as pro forma by some, and missed entirely by others. The doors to Wheeler Hall were open — the fact that someone was sleeping there at five o’clock on Friday morning doesn’t mean they were there to hear any warning that may have been given at another time, on another day.

Read the rest of this entry »

The DREAM Act, a bill currently working its way through Congress, is based on a simple premise — that undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children should have the opportunity to remain in the country they have come to call home.

In the service of that goal, the DREAM Act sets out a straightforward path to legal residency. It would make you eligible for permanent resident status if you were brought to the US before the age of fifteen, have lived here for five or more years, have graduated from an American high school, and have been enrolled in college or the armed forces for at least two years.

In the last few days, two individuals’ stories have come to the foreground of the DREAM Act campaign:

On Thursday, the US government announced that it was suspending deportation proceedings against Rigoberto Padilla, a Mexican-born student at the University of Illinois who has lived in Chicago since he was six years old. Padilla, a junior at UIC, became known to immigration authorities after he was picked up by police in a traffic stop in January, and was just six days away from deportation when the government halted the process.

Just as Padilla was receiving that reprieve, however, another young person found herself in his shoes.

Andrea Huerfano is a 24-year-old who has been in the United States since 2001. Her father was seeking political asylum, but he died while his case was pending. Her mother married an American citizen a few years later, gaining citizenship for herself and Andrea’s younger brother, but Andrea had by then turned 18, so she remained undocumented.

Huerfano graduated from Florida State University in 2008, with a degree in international studies. She was paying a traffic ticket last Tuesday when she was taken into custody by immigration officials. Huerfano was active in DREAM Act organizing as an undergraduate, and has worked on a variety of voter education and GOTV projects since graduation.

Padilla’s second chance came as a result of a yearlong campaign on his behalf, and now DREAM Activist, a group set up to push for the DREAM Act, has taken up her cause. You can find out more at their site or on Facebook.

Monday Update | According to a message sent out from the Facebook group Halt the Deportation of Student Activist Andrea Huerfano, immigration authorities have agreed to release Huerfano and give her a six month stay of removal. Details when I get them.