Campus activists who bantered about raping the president of the University of Ottawa student union are threatening to sue her after their comments were distributed to others in the campus community.
Early last month, Student Federation of the University of Ottawa president Anne-Marie Roy received screenshots of a chat that took place among several of her political opponents. In the chat, which took place during the most recent campus elections, five male students joke about orally and anally raping Roy in the student union offices, call her a “shit-eater,” and exchange other scatological and sexual taunts at her expense.
Roy went on to win the election.
As a blogger at The Belle Jar put it,
“This is the type of thing that’s said about women in positions of power – not a critique of their policies, but a threat of sexual violence. Not a comment on how they do their job, but graphic fantasies about how they should be sexually degraded. Nothing about their intelligence or capability, just a string of jokes about how riddled with venereal disease they are. This is misogyny, pure and simple. This is slut-shaming. This is rape culture.”
The students, two of whom sit on the Student Federation board with Roy, have not denied the veracity of the screenshots. Although the five initially sent Roy a letter of apology, three — Bart Tremblay, Alexandre Giroux and Michel Fournier-Simard — have said that they are contemplating legal action in response to the distribution of the images. A motion to condemn the students that was brought forward at last week’s meeting of the Federation board was tabled after Roy was served with what one student newspaper called “a cease and desist letter…telling her to not distribute the content of the emails.”
The screenshots were made public after the meeting, and a Facebook page demanding the five students’ resignation from their campus positions currently has nearly two hundred members.
Update | I wrote last year about the need for student organizations to develop robust policies on sexual harassment. While it’s not clear that this incident, which involved a private conversation, would be covered under such a policy, the importance of creating them is always worth reiterating.
March 2 Update | The four men who were elected representatives in the student federation or its clubs have resigned their positions. In a statement released today Anne-Marie Roy said that as far as she is aware, the three who had threatened to sue are still contemplating legal action. You can read Roy’s lengthy and compelling statement here.
March 4 Update | The students have apparently dropped their threat of legal action against Roy. Meanwhile, the university’s entire hockey team has been suspended in the wake of reports that team members participated in a group sexual assault of a woman last month.
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 1, 2014 at 11:33 am
CANPOL
the Ontario Court of Appeal has something to say about the invasion of privacy:
“One who intentionally intrudes, physically or otherwise, upon the seclusion of another or his private affairs or concerns, is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if the invasion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.” http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2012/2012ONCA0032.pdf%5B1%5D
No student posted this. Union activist outsiders, according to twitter.
March 1, 2014 at 12:45 pm
Angus Johnston
I’m skeptical that anyone could win a lawsuit in these circumstances, even if the name of the leaker were known (which it apparently isn’t).
But the technical legal merits of such a case aren’t really the point here. A lawsuit would splash the names of these guys all over the internet. The story — and the quotes — would follow them for the rest of their lives. I find it surprising that they’re not rushing to apologize, but filing suit against the woman they joked about raping would be a whole other level of stupid.
March 1, 2014 at 1:58 pm
capol
the name would get out. courts deal with much stupider cases.
March 1, 2014 at 2:43 pm
Weekend Links | Gerry Canavan
[…] * Students Joke About Raping Student Union President, Then Threaten to Sue Her. […]
March 1, 2014 at 5:27 pm
Angus Johnston
Capol, I’m not saying a court wouldn’t take the case. I’m saying that if these guys actually file suit, they’re a hell of a lot stupider than they look.
And given how stupid they look, that’s saying something.
March 3, 2014 at 6:28 pm
RealPolitik
They didn’t joke about raping her … they were talking about having sex with her. No rape was mentioned.
Sometimes I think people like this are just trying to see what they want to see. This is so far from “rape-culture” or “slut shaming” or whatever term you would like to invent and subsequently pretend is of equal seriousness to rape. Its just guys talking about what they’d like to do to a coworker they find attractive.
I love how the “big reveal” of this whole thing seems to be that men have sexual desires towards people they work with. Wow … did you women have your head so far up your asses to think that men don’t talk like this when together?? .. welcome to the real world …
This whole thing is just regular, male banter. Showmanship, tasteless bragging, the usual stuff. Not worth a loss of position, public shaming, and most CERTAINLY not anything to do with rape. By considering this even close to rape, you end up actually demeaning rape. Which is sad to see.
March 4, 2014 at 8:24 am
Angus Johnston
I couldn’t disagree more, Real. If you read the transcript of the chat, it’s clear that what’s being described is sex as assertion of power, not sex as a reflection of lust. What they’re saying is that they want to humiliate her sexually—to “punish” her, in Alex Larochelle’s words. Why? Because she’s powerful and they hate her and they want to bring her to heel.
There’s no discussion of consent here, but more than that there’s no mention of sexual desire or pleasure—hers or theirs. This is not men talking crudely about a woman they’re sexually interested in. This is men fantasizing and joking about sexual violence.
I’m a man. I’ve engaged in plenty of sexual banter over the years, not all of it particularly genteel. I know the difference between that and this.