The New Republic has a story out mocking and condemning what it describes as a trend toward the use of mandatory “trigger warnings” in college classes.
I don’t have time for a full post on this subject right now, but as I said on Twitter a few moments ago, while I’ve never given a trigger warning by that name, I do make a point of mentioning to my students at the start of the semester the fact that my courses sometimes address horrific and difficult subjects. Beyond that, I spend a lot of time thinking about how I prepare my students for traumatic material in class, and about how I present that material. Classrooms can be traumatizing environments, and it’s appropriate for professors to consider how to ameliorate that possibility.
After I logged off of Twitter, I got to thinking about whether it would be appropriate for me to address the subject of potentially traumatic subjects in the syllabus, and what an attempt to do so might look like. Here’s what I came up with:
“At times during this semester we may be discussing historical events that may be disturbing, even traumatizing. If you ever feel the need to step outside before or during one of these discussions, either for a short time or for the rest of the class session, you may always do so without academic penalty. If you ever wish to discuss your personal reactions to this material, either with the class or with me afterwards, I welcome such discussion as an appropriate part of our coursework.”
That’s just a very early first draft. I don’t know for sure that I’m going to incorporate this into syllabi going forward, but it’s a whack at the problem at least.
I’m interested to know what y’all think, and to see other examples, if you know of any.
Update | Having mulled it a bit, I believe I will include language along these general lines in future syllabi. This is no longer a hypothetical, in other words—it’s something I’m going to do. Again, I’d very much welcome reactions and suggestions.
Second Update | On Twitter, @AgentStarrk asks whether students who stepped out of a class under such circumstances would be responsible for the material they missed. It’s a good question, and the answer is yes, the same as if they were absent for any other reason. The “without academic penalty” phrasing is ambiguous, though—I’ll have to tweak it a bit.
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 4, 2014 at 8:38 pm
Pilant's Business Ethics Blog | Syllabus Content Warning
[…] via Content Warnings and College Classes |. […]
March 4, 2014 at 8:46 pm
southwerk
http://lizgloyn.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/the-classical-pedagogy-of-trigger-warnings/
Have you tried this post. This is James Pilant from Pilant’s Business Ethics. I’m not feeding you a trick link – it’s from the wordpress blog, Classically Inclined and discusses this same issue. jp
March 5, 2014 at 12:19 am
Jonathan Dresner
For a while now I’ve been using the following:
Advisory/Disclaimer
History is about real people, diverse cultures, interesting theories, strongly held belief systems, complex situations, and dramatic actions. This information may be disturbing. Such is the nature of historical study.
I got the original from a philosophy colleague, adapted it a bit. You can see it in context here: http://dresnerworld.edublogs.org/syllabi/syllabus-hist-101-world-history-to-1500-fall-2013/
March 5, 2014 at 8:00 am
Jonathan Rice
I think that the way you’ve phrased it here is excellent. While I do think that the overuse of trigger warning in an academic setting could lead to a sort of chilling effect in the long run, the solution you’ve found here for your syllabi is excellent. I can’t help but recall a classmate in high school who had very physical reactions to a course discussion on female genital mutilation. A content warning might have helped to prepare that student.
March 5, 2014 at 12:37 pm
Paul Kiser
I read your article via Pilant’s Business Ethics Blog. I’m not a professor; however, my spouse teaches at the U of Nevada and we have had several discussions about her constantly growing syllabus due to administration’s ongoing campaign to include every possible issue in an individual professor’s syllabus.
My suggestion, which my spouse likes, is that the University have a blanket syllabus that covers all the general do’s and don’ts. This document would be part of a signed agreement when a student is enrolled. A class syllabus needs to be focused on the key information for the class, not the university.
March 5, 2014 at 11:13 pm
Spring Break So Close You Can Taste It Links | Gerry Canavan
[…] “trigger warning” has spread from blogs to college classes. Can it be stopped? Content Warnings and College Classes. The Trigger Warned Syllabus. We’ve gone too far with ‘trigger warnings.’ I […]